Professional Disciplinary Applications at SACAT

Applications can be made to SACAT when it is alleged that certain professionals act in a way that requires disciplinary action to be taken against them. This may include when it is alleged that the professional has acted unlawfully, improperly, negligently or unfairly in the course of their work.

On Thursday 4 October 2018 SACAT will be conferred jurisdiction under the following Acts:

  • Conveyancers Act 1994
  • Land Agents Act 1994
  • Land Valuers Act 1994
  • Local Government Act 1999
  • Survey Act 1992

SACAT Process for Disciplinary Applications

Once an application has been made, and any relevant fee has been paid, the Tribunal will provide a copy of the application, and any documents provided in support, to the person who is the subject of the complaint.

Within 21 days of receiving a copy of the application, the person must provide a response to the Tribunal.

The Tribunal will schedule a directions hearing shortly after the application is received. The directions hearing will usually be held four to six weeks after the complaint is made.

At or after the first directions hearing, the Tribunal may decide that a further directions hearing is needed, refer the matter to a conference, or may decide that the matter is ready to go to a full hearing.

Tribunal Members for Disciplinary Applications

A legally qualified tribunal member will preside over the preliminary hearings held in a matter.

The Tribunal may decide that one or more assessors should sit with the legal member for the full hearing. Assessors are people with expertise in the relevant subject matter who can use that expertise to assist the member to reach the correct decision.

For example, in a matter about a conveyancer, the assessor(s) may be a conveyancer, and a representative of members of the public who have experience in dealing with conveyancers.

Either party involved in proceedings may ask that an assessor assist the member, although the final decision as to whether an assessor is used lies solely with the Tribunal.